tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9036104775563265647.post8389847582216175748..comments2024-03-25T12:31:58.169+00:00Comments on David Stimpson: The Pri50ner David Stimpsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15196038086564981619noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9036104775563265647.post-69987962541994595052017-07-17T13:24:58.001+01:002017-07-17T13:24:58.001+01:00Hello Arno,
I think McGoohan's concept of ...Hello Arno,<br /> I think McGoohan's concept of the Prisoner would remain the same today despite the world of "social media," McGoohan himself was a very private man and like-wise Number 6. Even John Drake liked to mind his own business and expected others to do the same.<br /> I think too many people are all to ready to give too many details of their private lives. The trouble is people like to be noticed, they like others to know all about <br />themselves. People are encouraged to share with others. I myself give something of myself, but the greater extent my private life remains private. I don't think what we call "private" is an obsolete term, its the meaning which seems to have been forgotten by the masses.<br /><br />Best regards<br />David<br />BCNUDavid Stimpsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15196038086564981619noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9036104775563265647.post-86754137699422251472017-07-17T09:20:18.976+01:002017-07-17T09:20:18.976+01:00Wouldn't McGoohan's conception of The Pris...Wouldn't McGoohan's conception of The Prisoner look very different if he saw that in our days of "social" media people, too many people in fact, are more than willing to present their private lives on a number of internet platforms and give away quite a lot more of information than just their date of birth? Isn't perhaps what we call "private" an obsolete term? Questions. - BCNU!nr6dehttp://www.nummer6-theprisoner.denoreply@blogger.com