The most apparent aspect of ‘the Prisoner’ is
that it’s circular, like a journey in a Village taxi. You can go anywhere you
like, just as long as you end up back where you started in the end. The
Prisoner resigns his job, is abducted to The Village. Is put through a number
of tests or ordeals, he refuses to talk, attempts to escape on a few occasions,
but always ends up back where he started. And this is no better demonstrated
than by ‘Many Happy Returns.’
The
wheels of the Penny Farthing turn, while their spokes point in all directions,
much like the feelers of The Village.
The
Prisoner is a round peg which refuses to fit. But thinking about it, it should
be the other way round, that the Prisoner should he a square peg which is then
shaped to fit!
And
‘Fall Out,’ a lasting escape? No, because the Prisoner had ended up where he
began, and is about to make the same mistake all over again. How to break this
vicious circle? Don’t resign in the first place…….unless his resignation had
nothing to do with his abduction to The Village, that having resigned his job
it was nothing more than a coincidence. After all there is no evidence that the
Prisoner’s resignation was the catalyst for his abduction. Remember he was
being watched before he handed in his resignation, what was that, sounded like
a click…what was that, sounded like a click… something in the mirror, or
was it over there? Yes over there too! So the question is, who was watching the
Prisoner and why? Obviously The Village administration had the cameras
installed in the Prisoner’s house, as Number 2 said that the Prisoner had
sneezed himself out of their camera. Was The Village observing the Prisoner as
an independent entity? However, seeing as it's the British behind The Village,
then in fact it was The Prisoner’s own people, who were actually watching him.
Why? Perhaps like ‘A’ and Chambers who became “late” of the Foreign Office, the
Prisoner was about to jump ship, but for a very different reason.
Be seeing you
No comments:
Post a Comment