Search This Blog

Saturday, 7 July 2012

Face Unknown

    It is such a pity that Vincent Tilsley's script for this particular episode was edited so much after he'd written it - because to Vincent Tilsley's mind they had made the script far worse, and more confusing than it was originally, or words to that effect. To be perfectly honest I am not one for reading scripts, yet having glanced through the script Face Unknown which was the original title for this episode, the episode would have ended up far more enjoyable for the viewer if director David Tomblin and co had not edited Tilsley's script.
    For example; it would appear that before the Prisoner was sent back to London, his mind was regressed back to the day of "crisis," to the day of the Prisoner's resignation - a most important moment in time. Originally we would have seen the Prisoner in his London home on the evening before the day he resigned, wearing his dressing gown as he settles himself down to write his letter of resignation - and having finished he places his resignation letter on the mantelpiece and retires to bed. The mind of the Prisoner having had been erased right back to the day before he resigned.
   The Prisoner awakens in what appears to be his own home, the camera makes a search, everything is quiet, and then we hear the Prisoner's voice;
    "Where am I? Home.....This isn't home...... There's something wrong."
    The Prisoner's hand appears into shot and picks up the travel brochures. This leads to a shot of a framed photograph of Janet Portland.
    "Janet.... You'll understand. I hope you'll understand."
   From the mantelpiece the Prisoner takes an envelope which contains his letter of resignation.
"My letter of resignation. Wrote it last night. said I'd sleep on it. Sleep.... Was it only last night?"
    The camera searches suspiciously.
    "Do they know? What have they done? They've done something.... Something.... There's something different.... what have they changed?"
   The camera hurtles to the window.
That's it! out there! there's something different out there! Looks the same. What's changed?.... Nothing. Nothing.
    {Well I would say that plenty has changed!}
    The Prisoner stuffs the letter into his pocket and heads for the door.
"It's all the same. Why should I think it's different?"
    The door opens violently and we see feet hurrying down the steps as the Prisoner hurries towards his parked Lotus 7.  A hand opens the door, and he gets into the drivers seat, and the engine is fired into life and revved up.
    "Of course it seems different. Of course. Things are different. Because - I - am - resigning! Now!"
   The Lotus 7 is picked up in the antlike traffic in a panorama shot of London, and zoomed in on, as the Lotus darts angrily through the traffic. There is a high shot of the Lotus as it enters the underground car park, and a shot through the cars windscreen as the Lotus enters the car park.
   The Prisoner storms along that darkened passageway.
"Whatever they're doing they can't stop me. I'm going to resign. They can't stop me.... they? Who are they?"
    The Prisoner bursts into the office, the standard office which we see in the opening sequence and gives his letter of resignation to the man behind the desk. the man looks surprised.
    Danvers "YES". What's this?"
    "Read it."
    "I don't understand."
    "Get me Sir Charles."
    Danvers {Frightened} "Who are you?"
    Prisoner "Who am I?"
    Hands reach out and grab Danvers by his jacket jerking him to his feet.
    "Get me Sir Charles Portland. At once!"
    Well, if that little scene is not enough to convince you that it was a mistake to change that to what we actually see in the episode Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling, I don't know what will. I think that the episode would have been better if the script had been left as Vincent Tilsley originally wrote it.
   What’s more, we see in the episode a patient in the amnesia room, an agent lying on a table, who gave them all the information No.2 wanted. Later all unpleasant memories of the village would be erased from the agents mind, so that later he can be returned to the outside world in order to gather more information....... And that's what they had originally done to the Prisoner, erased all unpleasant memories of the village, and released him in the outside world - so as to find Professor Seltzman, Professor Jacob Seltzman, and bring him back to the village!

Be seeing you

6 comments:

  1. This would have meant someone else would have been walking down that corridor - quite unsuitable as Mary Morris would say. ;)

    In the original script, was there an answer to the question why he resigned? If so this might have been one reason to rewrite it, doesn't it..?

    BCNU
    NoNo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello NoNo,

      Just as long as it wasn't Nigel Stock walking along that corridor in the guise of the Prisoner!

      Danvers, the man sat behind the desk does get to read the Prisoner's letter of resignation. But Danvers doesn't understand, and no mention of the content of resignation letter is made.

      Regards
      David
      Be seeing you

      Delete
    2. Hi David!
      I have to admit that I don't like the performance of Nigel Stock, and I don't like the inner monologues in this episode. Up to this time it was never neccessary to tell what Number Six thinks. You just could imagine. Perhaps (in my opinion) a kind of performance like in the beginning of Many Happy Returns would have been it. But - who could have done it, or done it better?

      Nevertheless I'd really like to read the original script. Thank you for posting this!

      Regards, NoNo

      Delete
    3. Hello NoNo,

      I agree with you. I don't like the perfomance of Nigel Stock as the Prisoner either. Stock said that he got the Prisoner's character right, as well as his mannerisms. Not in my book he didn't, he didn't even come close! Who could have done it better? There was one person, McGoohan's stunt double Frank Maher.

      I only have copies of two scripts, 'Hammer Into Anvil,' and 'Face Unknown.' If you want to read the scripts, two volumes containing all the scripts by Robert Fairclough can be bought via Amazon Books.

      Kind regards
      David
      BCNU

      Delete
  2. In one interview I read, Vincent Tilsley said his original script had a Magician involved somehow and a different man came out of the box... something like that. I'm not quite sure how much was changed here, rather than tweaked? Because when No6 *wakes up* he does seem to have had an erasure, because his *thought-voice* is chatting away as if he never had been to the village. It seems to be when he sees his face in the mirror that he suddenly is shocked back to the reality of what has happened to him. He then begins to play along with the "plot" of the Village, in order to regain his proper body - at least that's what seems to be going on to me.

    Otherwise, if he wasn't determined to get his own body back, he could just have "done a runner" - maybe taking Janet with him, to that tropical island in the sun that we saw in the brochures originally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Moor,

      Yes, I heard the story about as script for 'the Prisoner' which has a Magician in the Village, and Number 6 attempts to escape through a magic cabinet, or is made to diasappear through a cabinet, or something like that.

      Perhaps the Colonel's body wasn't up to the Prisoner's liking for him to do a runner. I liked the connection with Janet and the holiday brochures of a tropical beach.

      Regards
      David
      BCNU

      Delete