“I told
you, you were using the wrong approach.”
“Don’t worry, you did your best.
I’ll stress it in my report.”
{Number 2 and Nadia Rakovsky - The Chimes of Big Ben}
“I told
you, you were using the wrong approach?” Told who, Nadia Rakovsky? Who was she
to be instructing Number 2? The episode of ‘the Chimes of Big Ben’ appears to
be in a league of its own, because the idea behind it seems to have come from
an external source to the Village. Usually such business is conducted between
Number 2 and Number 1. But on this occasion Number 1 does appear to have been
cut out of the equation. Surely the idea behind ‘The Chimes of Big Ben’ didn’t
originate from the Colonel? He’s not high enough up the food chain within the
Establishment for that, plus it can be certain that he lacks the wit for any
such elaborate plan. And Nadia Rakovsky, exactly who is she going to give her
report to? Not Number 1, seeing as she’s dressed for leaving The Village. This
again suggests some external authority, but certainly not the Colonel, as he
has first hand experience regarding the plans failure. Sir Charles Portland
then? He’s high enough within the Establishment and would certainly have the
authority. But if not him, then some other high ranking Civil Servant. As for
Number 2, of him Nadia said he had done his best. But Number 2 didn’t do
anything, except to oversee that Number 6’s escape plan went ahead without any
kind of hindrance! As for Number 1, as previously written, he doesn’t appear in
the equation. In fact thinking about it, Number 1 doesn’t figure in ‘The
Prisoner’ until ‘A B and C.’ And even then it can only be assumed that its
Number 1, because it might be ridiculous to suggested that it was someone other
than Number 1. Yes it could be someone other than Number 1, someone superior to
Number 2. But then seeing as 2 is second only to 1, we take it that it is
Number 1 to whom 2 speaks on the telephone. What is ridiculous, is that
over-sized, curved, red telephone. I see Leo McKern was not forced to use that,
not even in ‘Once Upon A Time!’
Be seeing you
No comments:
Post a Comment